Institutional Aspects Of The Ethical Debate On Euthanasia. A Communicational Perspective

Authors

  • Mihaela Frunză
  • Sandu Frunză

Keywords:

euthanasia, public debate, public communication, public policies, state intervention, church intervention, dignity of death, quality of life, medical ethics, religious ethics

Abstract

Although euthanasia is seen as the problem of the individual will and as one’s right to privacy, to a better quality of life or to a dignified death, it has major institutional implications. They are closely related to the juridical system, to the way of understanding state involvement in protecting the individuals and respecting their freedoms, to the institutional system of health care, to the government rules that establish social, political or professional practices. The public debate around the topics related to the human condition, like euthanasia, grants a special force to public communication, to organizational communication, to communication in professional environments, to physician-patient communication and, more generally, to interpersonal communication. In this text we emphasize the importance of public debate on euthanasia from the perspective of organizational ethics, of medical deontology, of patients’ rights, but especially of elaborating public policies and national programs, and we underline the importance of the need to establish protocols for health care, as well as to build a framework of democratic communication.

Author Biographies

Mihaela Frunză

University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, the Center for Health Policy and Ethics, Iasi, Romania; Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Cluj, Romania.

Sandu Frunză

Babes-Bolyai University, Department of Communication, PR and Advertising, Cluj, Romania.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21